End of Covid protections could impact tens of thousands of vulnerable Doncaster residents

Watch more of our videos on Shots! 
and live on Freeview channel 276
Visit Shots! now
The end of coronavirus rules could impact society's most vulnerable people, including tens of thousands previously identified in Doncaster, charities have warned.

A group representing vulnerable families said a lack of guidance from the Government is concerning for the millions of people in England formerly advised to shield to avoid the risk of Covid infection.

NHS Digital figures show 8,415 patients in Doncaster were classed as clinically extremely vulnerable in April 2020 – shortly after they were first added to the shielding list.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

By the time the shielding programme came to an end on September 30 last year this had risen to 22,575 in the area, following an expansion of the list in February 2021 to include 1.7 million more people thought to be at risk nationally.

NHS Digital figures show 8,415 patients in Doncaster were classed as clinically extremely vulnerableNHS Digital figures show 8,415 patients in Doncaster were classed as clinically extremely vulnerable
NHS Digital figures show 8,415 patients in Doncaster were classed as clinically extremely vulnerable

Of those previously identified as most at risk in Doncaster, 20 per cent were aged between 70-79 – the largest proportion of all age groups.

Read More
Mike’s epic 151km in 24-hours run raises money for Doncaster hospice

They were among 3.7 million people across England classed as "clinically extremely vulnerable" at the time, though the Government said the term is no longer used.

And as of yesterday (Thursday February 24), all coronavirus laws in England – including the legal requirement for people who test positive to isolate – came to an end as part of the Government's strategy of "living with Covid".

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The Clinically Vulnerable Families support group said the move has left people who were once on the list in a "state of shock and anxiety".

Lara Wong, founder of the organisation, said: "The lack of government guidance puts vulnerable people in a difficult position.

"The removal of protections means that the risk of catching Covid will increase."

She said these protections had allowed vulnerable people a "small taste of freedom", but without clear guidance they must now make "impossible choices" between lives and livelihoods.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Ms Wong said non-vulnerable members of the population should continue to wear masks and isolate when needed.

The most common reason people in Doncaster were classed as vulnerable was because they were identified by an Oxford University tool, which assesses multiple factors to determine whether someone is at risk, such as their age, weight and ethnicity.

This applied to 40 per cent of patients in the area, where a reason was provided, and was followed by those with respiratory conditions that cause breathing difficulties (29 per cent).

A further nine per cent had rare genetic metabolic and autoimmune diseases.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

Disability charity Scope said many disabled people will feel forgotten by Prime Minister Boris Johnson's strategy, which also includes plans to scrap free universal testing in April.

James Taylor, of the charity, said: “Disabled people having to rely on the personal choices of others and having no control over their own freedom and safety isn’t ‘living with Covid’, it’s living with fear.

“Ending self-isolation and phasing out testing will leave some disabled people rolling the dice every time they leave the house."

The Department of Health and Social Care said it recognises the importance of ensuring people at higher risk from Covid-19 receive the right advice.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

A spokeswoman added: "This may be particularly important for those whose immune system means that they are at higher risk.

“Vaccines are the best way we can protect ourselves from the virus and we continue to urge all those eligible to get boosted now.”

In these confusing and worrying times, local journalism is more vital than ever. Thanks to everyone who helps us ask the questions that matter by taking out a subscription or buying a paper. We stand together. Nancy Fielder, editor.

Comment Guidelines

National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.