Town council blasts Doncaster garden centre over tree-felling as petition gathers pace
Bosses at Cherry Lane garden centre in Tickhill have been warned of boycotts and protests from local residents after a successful planning appeal against decisions from City of Doncaster Council and Tickhill Town Council who wanted the lime trees – planted in 1897 – to remain in place.
Chiefs want to remove two of an avenue of 80 trees for safety reasons and to create a new entrance to the garden centre on the A631.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdNow Tickhill Town Council has waded into the row – as a petition against the taking down of the trees reached 2,000 signatures.


In a statement, a spokesperson said: “Tickhill Town Council has objected to these plans at each stage of the planning process and have not been consulted by Cherry Lane Garden Centre.
"The company is seeking to remove historic trees from our town to improve access for HGVs which the town does not want or need.
"It is ironic that a garden centre (in the words of Joni Mitchell) is literally seeking to pave paradise to put up a parking lot.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad"Unfortunately, we do know what we will lose when the trees are gone.
“In addition to the loss of trees, there is a real safety concern, with the addition of an HGV entrance being installed opposite an existing HGV entrance onto the already busy A631.
“Planted to commemorate Queen Victoria's Diamond Jubilee the avenue of lime trees holds a deep significance for the residents of Tickhill and the surrounding areas and is an iconic part of our town’s landscape.
"This plan disregards the symbolic significance of these trees, their ecological role, and the safety aspect of the location of the junction, and at no point has there been any will from the owners of Cherry Lane to work with or seek the desires of the local community.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad“We encourage Cherry Lane to be better neighbours and consult and work with the local community before pushing through these plans.”
A protest group – Save Tickhill’s Trees – has been set up and there have been calls to boycott the garden centre in Bawtry Road.
But Cherry Lane bosses say the trees need to be brought down for safety reasons as part of plans to create a new entrance to the site.
In a lengthy statement, a spokesperson said: “At Cherry Lane Tickhill, we are committed to ensuring the safety of our visitors, colleagues, and the community.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad“As a much-loved venue for all ages, safety of our staff and visitors is our priority.
"When we took over the site in 2008, the loading bay was already established but was later taken out of use due to safety concerns for the vehicles exiting onto the busy A631 Bawtry Road.
"Since then, deliveries have been unloaded in the car park. However, as the popularity of the site has grown, this has become increasingly unsafe and large delivery vehicles and forklifts among our visitors has been the cause of increasing concerns, highlighting the need to address this risk.
“To resolve this issue, we are reopening the purpose-built delivery yard to create a safer, more efficient solution that protects our visitors and staff.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad"To ensure the yard operates safely and effectively, two mature lime trees located on either side of the access road must be removed.
"This work will widen the access road’s entrance, improving visibility and significantly reducing the risk of accidents along the busy A631 Bawtry Road.
“We understand the concerns surrounding the removal of mature trees and are taking every precaution to minimise environmental impact.
"All works are being carried out under the supervision of a qualified arboriculturist to ensure careful management of root systems and soil compaction.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad"This project has been granted planning permission following an independent review by a highly qualified inspector appointed by the Secretary of State, ensuring compliance with the highest professional standards.
“Cherry Lane is an independent, family owned and run business and is deeply committed to sustainability through our Value Our Planet initiative. We recognise the importance of making small but meaningful improvements that reduce our environmental impact.
"Across our business, we are continually working to improve packaging efficiency, reduce waste and recycle more.
"Additionally, we are expanding our range of sustainable products and providing more recycling options in-store.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad“We invite our customers to join us in making Small Changes for a Big Difference, as together we can create a better future for our planet while maintaining the safety and enjoyment of our community spaces.”
Red ribbons have been attached to the trees and a spokesperson for Save Tickhill's Trees said: “The lime trees form part of Tickhill’s cherished landscape and are part of the heritage of the area for over a century.
“Despite huge local objection, including Doncaster Council refusing permission, they appealed and got their plans passed to the shock of all local residents.
"Tickhill has so much to offer. There is a huge array of wonderful local, independent shops, cafes, restaurants within the centre.
“Please support THESE shops when visiting.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide Ad“Enjoy the lime tree avenue while you can and together we can make a difference.”
One protester said: “Tickhill residents are now talking about demonstrating, boycotting and protesting against them. We all feel absolutely helpless that a large corporation can act in such a way.”
The family-owned business has 17 garden centres throughout East Anglia, Yorkshire and the Midlands and was established in 2001 with the purchase of three garden centres in East Anglia by parent QD Group, whose CEO is Nick Rubins, the current High Sheriff of Nottinghamshire.
In 2012, Doncaster Council unveiled proposals to chop down the 80 trees at a cost of £20,000.
Advertisement
Hide AdAdvertisement
Hide AdThe council said the trees were showing signs of ageing and posed a danger – and a report commissioned in 1996 suggested the trees had been badly affected by excessive road salt.
But after an outcry by local residents, the trees remained.
A petition against the tree removal has been set up HERE
Comment Guidelines
National World encourages reader discussion on our stories. User feedback, insights and back-and-forth exchanges add a rich layer of context to reporting. Please review our Community Guidelines before commenting.