Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Thursday, 20th November 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Movies - The X-Files: I want to Believe (15)



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
14 August 2008
FORMER FBI agents Fox Mulder (David Duchovny) and Dana Scully (Gillian Anderson) are called back into action when a female Fed is abducted in rural Virginia – the X-Factor being a dubious psychic that claims to have visions leading to her whereabouts.
During the years since the series, Mulder has been discredited and is living as a fugitive, whilst Scully has left the bureau to become a full time physician. Thankfully the two have no problems slipping back into their trademark roles of paranormal
believer and cynical physician as they're faced with the ravings of Billy Connolly's wild-haired and woolly psychic, who's a creepy ex-priest and notorious paedophile.

The film is designed to be a standalone 'episode' which should give the writers a clean slate, allowing them to recreate some of the X-citement of the classic episodes. It's clear that they were still saddled with some of the baggage of the series' more elaborate plot twists and have been obliged to include throw-away references that disrupt the flow of the story. This must be deeply unsatisfying for die-hard fans but it's even more at odds with the film's attempts to make this accessible to the masses. From the lack of opening credits, through the bland snow-scape scenery to the tired re-tread of the faith vs. science discussions, the film feels flat. It's plain to see that creator Chris Carter is a made for TV director; his biggest mistake is to jettison the ingredients that made the show such a success.

The closest that the film gets to dabbling with the paranormal is the presence of the psychic – Connolly's humourless performance is sinister enough but a psychic's visions in a serial killer case is hardly an original premise and does nothing to challenge the boundaries of the audience's beliefs. The sense of mystery and intrigue is lost over the running time as there's barely enough meat on the bones to justify this being any longer than the old hour-length episodes. It feels dull and drawn out in comparison to the frenetic action that we've come to expect from contemporary series such as 24 and CSI, let alone a big summer blockbuster.

I wanted to believe that there was more to this than merely cashing in on the classic show - and call me a sceptic - but there's not a lot here to make me believe otherwise. Had this been condensed into an hour and aired on TV 10 years ago it would have been an average episode at best, but on the big screen this is an in-X-cusable waste of time, money and potential.

Rating *



The full article contains 452 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 14 August 2008 12:42 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Doncaster
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Krisek,

Highfields 21/09/2008 05:05:17
i am a big fan of the x-files unfortunately very disappointed by this movie. in fact i dont understand why they made a movie that has almost nothing in common with the x-files except the main characters of course. Moreover if you consider the first movie "the xfiles the movie" not good but not bad. So, i was expecting more... more action, the little something that made be like it before. Afterall this is maybe because the time has come to turn the page. Nothing to see, nothing to be scared, only a waste of time
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.